Project · Developer Tools
A platform that connects to your GitHub and Claude Code sessions, reads what you built that day, and writes the post for you. Building in public shouldn't require a separate writing session after a long build day.
When I started building, the consistent advice was to build in public — tweet what you shipped, share your progress, document the journey. Good advice. But after a six-hour build session, writing a coherent post about what you just did is the last thing you want to do. The friction kills it.
I was focused on shipping code. So I thought: why not build the tool that does the writing for me? Connect it to what I actually built that day, let it summarize, and give me something I can publish with minimal editing.
Two problems. First, maintaining a reliable MCP connection across Claude Code sessions. The integration has to be invisible enough that you forget it's running. Second, state consolidation: commits from GitHub, task summaries from the MCP, and multiple sessions in a day all need to collapse into a summary that reads like a build log, not a data dump. State reliability is the current focus and the next problem on the roadmap.
Build log — commits pulled automatically, AI summary generated on demand
Settings — GitHub webhook + BIP MCP for Claude Code, both active
Connect your GitHub account and BIP installs a webhook on the repos you choose. Every push automatically adds to your build log — no manual steps. Connect the BIP MCP to Claude Code and it silently logs task summaries after each session, even on days with no commits.
From the dashboard, hit "Generate summary" and BIP produces an AI-written entry from your day's commits and Claude Code activity. Review it, edit if needed, and publish to your public profile.
Critically, BIP only sees commit messages, file names, branch names, and Claude Code task summaries. It never reads your code or conversation history.
Decision 01
Summarization layer first, distribution laterThe temptation was to build the social publishing integration immediately — connect to Twitter, LinkedIn, post directly. Instead, the core loop (capture → summarize → publish to profile) was validated first. Distribution is only worth building once the underlying content is good.
Decision 02
MCP over manual inputRather than asking users to log what they worked on, BIP connects to Claude Code sessions via an MCP server. The agent silently records task summaries after each session. On days with no commits, the MCP fills the gap. The user never has to remember to log anything.
Decision 03
Build the loop, then the audienceBIP is publicly accessible but hasn't been announced anywhere. The core loop works and is being used daily to generate build logs for BIP and pointd. Announcing before the experience is solid enough to explain itself without context would just front-load expectations the product isn't ready to meet.
The current version handles the capture and summarization layer. What's next:
Connect the generated summaries directly to Twitter, LinkedIn, and long-form write-up formats. One click from the build log to published post — or daily/weekly/monthly digest formats for different cadences.
The longer-arc vision: a public feed where builders share not just text logs but fragments of what they built — interactive prototypes, UI components, features — that other people can try directly in the feed. A place where building in public means more than tweeting.